Profile Main Image

Leon Diniz

Likely decklists and staples of the new Pioneer format

We have some ideas of decks and cards that are likely to be played

The Pioneer format has just been [link](https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/news/announcing-pioneer-format-2019-10-21)(announced to the world of Magic) and lots of people are already putting their minds into creating decks to break the format. And even though we don't have a crystal ball to guess about it, we already have a clue of which cards are likely to be played. And some decks that, as they have been strong in the past, should remain strong in this new terrain. *STAPLES* Before talking about the cards that are likely to be played in this format, I would like to talk about a strange movement that occurred. <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A bunch of (presumable) Pioneer staples rose in price dramatically, about 9 days before the format was announced.<br><br>Which is, I&#39;m sure, a completely normal and coincidental thing to have had happen. <a href="https://t.co/bP0gAvdBeB">pic.twitter.com/bP0gAvdBeB</a></p>&mdash; April King (@CubeApril) <a href="https://twitter.com/CubeApril/status/1186316078248579072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 21, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Apparently, the likely staple cards of this new format already spiked in price 9 days before the announcement. We don't know if information was leak, but it is important to note that we will not talk about cards that are necessarily cheap, as stores have already raised the prices of most. *STAPLES - LANDS* In a format without Fetchs, shocks + checklands + fastlands will be kings, guarantee them all now. Also make room for some special lands:   [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1571716753.jpeg) [card](Mutavault) and [card](Unclaimed Territory) will be staples on every tribal deck. [card](Mana Confluence) will appear on combo decks of 4 or more colors. We should also see [card](Field of the Dead) played on some decks, while we see control decks with [card](Field of Ruin). *STAPLES - ARTIFACTS* [card](Smuggler's Copter) and [card](Aetherworks Marvel) were oppressors in Standard, so much so that they were banned. Mox Ambar is a strong artifact that we have to closely watch. [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1571717305.jpeg) *STAPLES - BLUE* The blue color is probably the color that Wizards of the Coast will see the most within these next few months. It has 3 key pieces that should come in many decks: [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1571717998.jpeg) We should also see [card](Opt) and [card](Censor) played on some decks. *STAPLES - GREEN* [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1571718382.jpeg) Frontier was the predecessor format to this one, and it was reigned by [card](Collected Company). [card](Deathrite Shaman) will be really good in a format that have delve + rally decks. *STAPLES - WHITE* [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1571718635.jpeg) Without [card](Path to Exile), I see the white color on this new format more as a support color. The color is still strong and brings cards like the Teferis (Hero of Dominaria and Time Raveler), but should always be accompanied with other colors as well. Some white cards stand out, such as [card](Rally the Ancestors) or [card](Blessed Alliance). *STAPLES - BLACK* [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1571718875.jpeg) The efficiency of the black color can make it one of the strongest colors in this new format. [card](Deathrite Shaman), [card](Thoughtseize), [card](Fatal Push), and [card](Stitcher's Supplier) are extremely strong cards that are played in other formats. *STAPLES - RED* [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1571719225.jpeg) Red comes with cards like [card](Ramunap Ruins) which allows that last damage point in burn decks, [card](Burning-Tree Emissary) that is played in almost all formats for being a "free" 2/2 creature who still helps with your mana and [card](Goblin Rabblemaster), a very valuable creature. Red is currently extremely fast and we will have to see how the meta will adapt to it. *DECKLISTS* Below are some decks that are bound to be played in this new format. [deck](17109) [deck](17111) [deck](17115) [deck](17110) I'll leave it here [link](https://cardsrealm.com/decks/folder/69-pioneer)(a folder with lots of decks that me and my friends thought about in this new format.)

Share:

Profile Main Image

Leon Diniz

Social: YoutubeInstagramTwitter

Profile Main Image

Diogo Leal

Interviewing Thoralf Severin, winner of Mythic Championship IV


We interviewed Thoralf Severin right after he won the Mythic Championship IV, in a time where Hogaak was still there in Modern Metagame. But we fill like Thoralf was so nice, that we should make this interview more accessible to everyone, thus translate it now. [deck](11987) *When did you start in Magic: The Gathering and how was it like to enter the competitive scene?* I started to play Magic around Nemesis with friends from my school. They dropped it fairly quickly, but I strived to play more and more. I remember playing an Odyssey block constructed GP in germany. Germany in total was very competetive in magic, Berlin wasn't so I didn't play a lot of tournaments for a long time. *Today you are a player who lives exclusively on Magic?* Definitely not. Living of tournament magic is extremly difficult and can really only be done with a lot of content creation - something I didn't get to. *What is your favorite format and why?* Limited, specifically Chaos Draft. I am not a fan of playing the same deck for many many hours, so I like the diversity of limited. *How was your journey to MC IV?* I was a bit out of the loop for competetive magic, but when Arne Huschenbeth moved to berlin, him, Jasper Grimmer and myself formed a team, that traveled to every european GP. Especially on team GP's we were extremely successfull, which got me to hit exactly gold until (included) Barcelona. *Since the appearence of [card](Karn, the Great Creators), most of Tron's players have been adapting their lists to include the card. You have, however, opted for a list closer to the traditional archetype. What is the reason for this choice?* I started with the small Karn and I was really disappointed. Karn rarely won on the spot and was mostly very difficult to keep alive. There are no creatures to defend and no artifacts to get, that helped once he was gone. Bridge was usually bad, because of too man cards in hand. When [card](Hogaak, Arisen Necropolis) became so popular, we really wanted the Leylines in our sideboard and that was also not possible with all those artifacts for Karn. The tipping point was, that we wanted to have more space for all 4 Wurmcoils and 3 [card](Walking Ballista). I played 2 leagues with the MC4 list and went 10-0. It felt great. [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/uploads/1565462372.jpg) *Another interesting choice from your list is the inclusion of the fifth forest in place of the Ghost Quarter. Would you keep this choice for the future?* There were hardly any matchups, where the ghostquarter was needed anymore. In addition to that, there were a lot of matchups where we wanted a lot of basics, specifically UW control and Eldrazi tron (with Crucible). You do need some green sources and the addition of Blast Zone (which is mendatory!) means one less slot. In the end I felt (my team still played Ghostquarter), i wont play as much Tron and Inkmoth Nexus decks since they seemed to be less played. *Usually Tron has a hard core of Cards that cannot be changed. Tutors effects (like [card](Expedition Map)) or cantrips for example. You, however, have dared to remove 1 [card](Chromatic Sphere) from the list, making some Tron players go crazy. Is it possible to do It without fear of run out of green mana?* I was saying this to my team since London. The new mulligan rule allows you to do this. I have played a lot of games with tron and the way you are actively mulliganing for tron allows you to not need those extra tiny percentages on drawing a tron pice with a Sphere. Before that, you needed to keep most 2 tron pieces hands, because you just couldnt mulligan to a better hand. Therefor you needed a lot of redraws to make those hands work. Now, with basically mulliganing everything that cant make tron, you need one of those cyclers and mostly exactly one. They are fine in the late game, as they get a new card, but I wanted one more big card. That also fit well with the 5th forest. *How do you generally evaluate Tron's position in the current Modern goal?* Definitely a good deck, especially when people arent prepaired. If nobody plays Damping Sphere or less Fulminator, less Extraction, less Stony Silence, etc. your stability carries you through the games. Additionally your matchups against UR Phoenix and Jund and E Tron and Urza are pretty good, while we were about even on Hogaak. Right now, we are even significantly ahead against Hogaak, but i think we shouldn't be much better than 50%. *Do you defend Hogaak's ban? If this happens, what should change in the Metagame?* I do think it can be defeated, but the costs of diversity are just too high. I, personally, would rather exclude some cards, so that more decks (and whole stategies) can be played, than to have the metagame of playing one deck or a deck that beats that one deck. Unfortunately that would make tron a bit worse in my opinion, since a lot of bad matchups (like burn, or Scapeshift or storm) are currently being forced out and they would certainly return. Also people would have more sideboard slots. Modern has huge potential to be an awesome format with lots of different decks and interactions. *Last question. About the [card](Ghost Quarter), it seems you preferred to have a better list overall (having more green mana), but in response you have a worst match up with decks that have Inkmoth Nexus. [link](https://channelfireball.com/articles/a-deck-with-extreme-matchups-is-statistically-better-than-one-with-even-matchups/)(This is something that has been discussed for a long time and Channel Fireball wrote an article about it): "It is better to have a deck that have good match ups and bad match ups than to have a deck that wins 50% of the time against everyone". What do you think of this statement? In this mythical championship did you play against an inkmonth nexus deck anytime?* i agree with this statement, but it was also paired with the fact, that i really didnt expect there to be many inkmoth decks. you are correct, i made it much weaker against those to get some advantage somewhere else. I did play against hardned scales in the swiss and then in the finals (same guy) In the end i didnt play UW or E tron, so my 5th forest wasnt obviously better. I think in the end, if you have really no idea what people play, running Ghost Quarter is probably a good idea especially if people are not switching easily to a different (newer deck) *Thank you very much for the interview.* No worries :) was a pleasure!

Share: