Hey guys o/ Here's Ari and in today's article we will have a look at a Rogue deck of the Pauper format: The Goblin Aristocrats. I recently featured on the [link](https://youtube.com/manadelver)(Mana Delver youtube channel) a deck tech from a player called [link](https://www.mtggoldfish.com/player/aokis)(aokis) that made 5-0 in an MTGO league. [deck](13131) My goal is to talk about the changes I've made to this list to suit my playing style, but first, as I try to write articles for all levels of players, I'd like to comment on the name of the deck. We usually classify as Aristocrats the decks that use creature sacrifice as their main strategy to generate value and win their games. This nomenclature started at the time of the Innistrad Standard with the cards [card](Falkenrath Aristocrat) and [card](Cartel Aristocrat). Since then several decks have appeared, in various formats, named Aristocrats. In Pauper we have Golgari Aristocrats which is a well known deck in the format, but the fact that it has no card that makes mention of the name Aristocrats can confuse anyone who does not know the origin of the nomenclature. [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/dka-dark-ascension-falkenrath-aristocrat-138.jpg) [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/gtc-gatecrash-cartel-aristocrat-150.jpg) *The art of playing with rogues decks* Do you know that urge to play with a rogue deck? I confess I had not felt for a long time, but the Goblin Aristocrats aroused this dormant feeling. I was always interested in playing with decks created around less popular cards. Putting my deck building in action, doing a lot of testing and keeping track of changes, winning consolidated format decks, and getting positive feedback from other players are some of the motivations that make me enjoy playing with these less competitive decks. At Pauper, I've played a lot with Rakdos Madness, [link](https://cardsrealm.com/metagame/pauper/suicide-black)(Suicide Black), Eggs ... They didn't bring me great results, but they certainly all bring back memories of the good times I had at MTG. For those who do not know the deck, in short the Goblin Aristocrats uses various goblins that through cards like [card](Goblin Chirurgeon) and [card](Goblin Sleeder) can be sacrificed to interact with other cards on the deck like [card](Mortician Beetle) and [card](Falkenrath Noble). [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/me1-masters-edition-goblin-chirurgeon-94.jpg) [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/c17-commander-2017-falkenrath-noble-113.jpg) * The Pauper Winter * Pauper is currently experiencing a time when many decks are using [card](Arcum's Astrolabe) to correct the base mana and break attempt to explore the card with some other interaction. Dissatisfied with some parts of the deck, and suffering mainly from the mana base, I decided to follow the format trend and appeal to the snowy mana base. The [link](https://www.mtggoldfish.com/player/aokis)(aokis) list uses 22 lands, and a considerable portion of them enters tapped. Although the deck is midrange, I came across a number of situations where the fact that having lands entering tapped turned in a huge disadvantage. I am currently playing with the following snowy list: [deck](13052) * Mana Base * Using [card](Arcum's Astrolabe), you can decrease the number of lands from 22 to 19. [card](Ash Barrens) and [card](Evolving Wilds): They are important for fetching the snowy lands. I'm a fan of Ash Barrens, but I don't use 4 just to lower the chance of coming with 2 in the starting hand. [card](Great Furnace) and [card](Vault of Whispers) are on the deck to interact with [card](Kuldotha Rebirth) and [card](Krark-Clan Shaman). You can increase the number of artifact lands and use [card](Galvanic Blast) instead of [card](Lightning Bolt). Testing is required to ensure that we will not miss snowy lands to cast the Astrolabe early in the game. *Artifacts* The original list used only 6 artifacts (4 lands and 2 [card](Sylvok Lifestaff)). I chose to use more artifacts, precisely because of [card](Kuldotha Rebirth) and [card](Krark-Clan Shamman). The snowy list uses twice as many artifacts and we still have the option to use more artifacts lands as mentioned above. About the artifacts, I see the possibility of making some changes like decreasing 1 [card](Prophetic Prism) and increasing 1 [card](Ichor Wellspring) or maybe back with 1 copy of [card](Sylvok Lifestaff) to main deck, since I realized that the deck has a tricky match against Burn. *Removals* Although [card](Terminate) is one of Pauper's best removals, I chose to use 2x [card](Goblin Grenade), it couldn't be any different, the deck has a lot of synergy with the card and its damage can be maximized if it has one or more [card](Falkenrath Noble) in the field. The [card](Lightning Bolt) is important for removing an opponent's key creature or dealing with an [card](Ephemerate). It is versatile and ultimately can end the game. Galvanic Blast would be an improvement, but the function would remain the same. [card](Sparksmith) as well as [card](Warren Weirding) (side) are our tutorable removals. I like Sparksmith because depending on the situation it is interesting to control your opponent's table and deal a lot of damage using our 1/1 goblin cards. Not to mention that sometimes the opponent spends all his removals on Sparksmith and is unresponsive to our other threats. *Creatures* Although we play with a lot of "insignificant" goblin tokens, the deck has creatures that are only good in isolation but very strong when they are together on the battlefield. The [card](Goblin Chirurgeon) gives a lot of consistency to our deck. It makes life very difficult for our opponent who will suffer to remove our main threats, [card](Mortician Beetle) and [card](Falkenrath Noble), if the surgeon is in the field. Regenerating any of these creatures means that in addition to keeping them alive, you still have trigged their abilities. Important reminder: You can only regenerate a creature that would be destroyed. But not if it is sacrificed or given -1 / -1 markers, ok? The [card](Goblin Sleeder) is on the deck along with the Surgeon and the [card](Krark-Clan Shaman) (side) to enable the sacrifice of our creatures. If the opponent happens to have no blockers for the [card](Falkenrath Noble) or [card](Mortician Beetle), this is the perfect situation to maximize turn damage with the [card](Goblin Sleeder). It is also useful for our creatures to stay alive during combat exchanges. [card](Goblin Matron) is very important on the deck, I don't have much to say about the card, only that I use 4 copies, because I always want to have it in hand to get the goblin I need according to the situation of the game. [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/som-scars-of-mirrodin-kuldotha-rebirth-96.jpg) And to wrap up the article, [card](Kuldotha Rebirth) went very well on the deck giving more meaning to the use of the Astrolabe and fueling our sacrifices. It's always important to keep the table full of goblins. And the post-side [card](Kuldotha Rebirth) proved to be a great way to recover from a mass removal. Lastly, had experienced some situations that I had many goblins on the battlefield I am considering using 1 copy of [card](Goblin Bushwhacker) to be tutored by Matrona in these situations.
Hello my dears! All right with you? My name is Fogaça and I'm here again to talk about Commander. One day, when I was playing with [card](Kykar, Wind's Fury), I was at a table against the newly printed Urza, who gave me the idea of setting up my list. In that same game, we began to observe an interesting phenomenon that commonly affects players who are transitioning between casual and competitive; I named this occurrence the Archenemy Effect. It is defined by the times when you alone become the focus of the table and have to endure all the aggressiveness coming from your opponents. After much thought, I came up with a text that said how to avoid this kind of thing, but in the end, it's not just up to you, so my conclusion was that the best option is to go for it and give reasons they all should focus one you - I chose today, the deck that has everything to be targeted at the table and, oddly enough, can sustain its game even with these adversities: [card](Urza, Highlord Artificer). [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/mh1-modern-horizons-urza-lord-high-artificer-75.jpg) *INTRODUCTION* Again we talk about an iconic lore character, and again, I won't give details about his story, but if Urza is so important to Magic, his card is equivalent to that importance. Their skills characterize the classic archetype of artifacts used in blue, but correcting all the deficient! Two important advantages of this one: saves you against hates of activated abilities and the use of colorless manas over colored manas. *DECK CONSTRUCTION* Deepening the previous explanation, the construction was designed to circumvent the terror known as [card](Stone Silence), as Urza's own ability allows his artifacts to still generate mana. This condition alone imposes a tremendous advantage in that it takes advantage of stones that previously had no potential for efficient conversion as [card](Mox Sapphire) - so we will use cards like [card](Gemstone Amulet) and [card](Goblet of Perennial Flow). The moment we accept that we will be the target of the table, we will need consistent and independent forms of victory, even if they are not completely disconnected from each other. With that in mind, we will have four ways to beat the potential game. We will start with an infinite mana condition ([card](Isochronous Scepter) and [card](Dramatic Reversal) or [card](Lareiluz Rings) and [card](Basalt Monolith)) that will take advantage of the commander's ability to exile all our library, followed by the casting of one of our extra turns ([card](Destiny Nexus) or [card](Tomorrow's Guide)); As our deck will be in exile, the card played will solve your shuffle, becoming the only one on our top, so it will always be our draw and allow infinite turns. Another possibility will be to replace our extra turns with [card](Blue Sun Zenith), initially stating its cost to zero; The next steps will involve buying it again and using it to have our opponents draw all of their cards, thus conditioning a defeat by overdeck. Referring to the overdeck itself, our third possibility includes the effects of [card](Lab Maniac) and [card](Jace, Mystery Manipulator) conjured after we have exiled our entire library. Finally, the combination of [card](Future Vision) and [card](Sensei's Divination Top), together with a cost reducer, will condition a total purchase of our spells and the sequel with the other victory plans. [deck](12409) Everything else on our list benefits the control arquetype and maximize the synergy between each piece (citing the inclusion of [card](Sai, Master Topterist), and [card](Trail of Evidence)). *HIGH CARD REPLACEMENT* We will not have such a wide coverage in this session, as deck synergy is essential to the principle of holding three players at the same time, but back to the old story of replacing high value cards with one of the same function. *WHERE TO START?* What gives this build's solidity is essentially the use of mana, which should be prioritized with the acquisition of the stones. Combos also contribute to consistency, but you can start if buying one of the combos above mentioned and than go for the others. *CONCLUSION* Even though I have not discussed any concept today, I think this article can generate a fruitful debate. Many who play the purest CEDH forgets that there are tables where casual and optimized players mingle, creating unique phenomena for formats where there is no direct duel. My goal here was just to give an idea to those who are frustrated that they have a target on their forehead - accept their target and give reason for it.
Jogador de Magic desde Tarkir, sou apaixonado por interações e sinergias que quebram a curva do jogo. Para mim, o cEDH é o teste máximo para o jogador de Magic, tanto para deck build, quanto para gameplay. Para me acompanhar no YouTube, acessem meu canal.
Yesterday at [link](https://twitch.tv/pauperacademus)(my livestream on Twitch) we discussed a bit on the subject of whether [card](Arcum's Astrolabe) or [card](Ephemerate) should be banned or not. It made me reflect on both [card](Arcum's Astrolabe) and [card](Ephemerate). They are strong and changed the format, but are they healthy for the format? [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/mh1-modern-horizons-ephemerate-7.jpg) [image](https://cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/en/mh1-modern-horizons-arcums-astrolabe-220.jpg) The artifact [card](Arcum's Astrolabe) allowed for a large color variation in the format. Now we have many 3-color decks variants. A few weeks after it was spoiled we realized a relatively healthy format with a large variation of decks, but mostly gaining value within card advantage, and other decks that try to win the game before card advantage can impact the game. The [card](Arcum's Astrolabe) itself was not so strong, but rather its strong interaction with [card](Kor Skyfisher) and [card](Glint Hawk). I really believe that none of them will be banned as they allow for a greater variation of decks, colors and possibilities. Initially believed in the ban, but this would lower the power level of the format, the best solution is to wait for stronger cards that enable other types of mechanics. [card](Ephemerate) on the other hand has an absurd power level, this is undeniable. The fact that after the re-cast she goes to the graveyard and not exile is scary: it can work on various deck versions that use cards that bring the graveyard back to the deck or to the hand. It has such a high value that it can make a [card](Mulldrifter) draw up to 6 cards or [card](Memonic Wall) fetch several cards from the graveyard including ephemerate itself. Of course his great value is enhanced by the combination of [card](Glint Hawk) + [card](Arcum's Astrolabe) + [card](Ephemerate). In my regard I believe more in the ban of [card](Ephemerate) than the [card](Arcum's Astrolabe), but their combination brought out 100% of the [link](https://cardsrealm.com/metagame/pauper/skred)(Skred) and it has being dominant in the format. Within the analysis via games and possible combinations, it is possible to ban the [card](Ephemerate), but I think [card](Arcum's Astrolabe) remains in the format for a while. Wizards of the Coast normally prefers to lower the power level of the format by banning every time it makes unbalanced cards, but I will say it again that it is always better to create new strong cards than banning others. The next B&R announcement will be on October 7, 2019. What do you expect from it?
Biólogo em Ribeirão Preto. Jogador e produtor de conteúdo sobre MTG. Apresentador e colaborador no canal Pauper Academus. Aficionado pelo Pauper. mas me arisco em outros formatos.